Maariv: Bab al-Mandab Is Sana’a’s Most Dangerous Weapon; Missiles on Tel Aviv Are Merely a Diversion
Israeli circles believe that the maritime threat imposed by Sana'a forces in the Red Sea is far more dangerous than missile attacks, warning of broad economic and geopolitical consequences for Israel and global trade.
NYN | Reports and Analyses
The Hebrew newspaper Maariv revealed that the recent missile attacks targeting the occupied Jaffa area (Tel Aviv) do not represent the most significant threat Israel faces from Sana’a forces. According to the newspaper, the real danger lies in their ability to influence maritime traffic through the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandab Strait.
Maritime Threat Tops Israeli Concerns
The newspaper explained that the maritime operations carried out by Sana’a forces, along with repeated warnings directed at Israeli vessels or ships linked to Israel, have become a growing strategic concern for the Israeli security establishment, particularly amid ongoing regional tensions.
It noted that the recent missile strikes carry a tactical dimension, whereas the potential impact on trade routes and maritime corridors remains the most sensitive issue for the Israeli economy and its allies.
Sana’a Returns to the Forefront
According to the report, the return of Sana’a forces to conducting direct operations after a period of relative calm reflects their continued role within the “Unity of Fronts” equation and confirms that the Yemeni front remains capable of influencing the course of regional developments.
The newspaper added that this development sends a clear message to Israel’s political and security leadership that challenges originating from Yemen cannot be ignored or underestimated.
Bab al-Mandab: A Chokepoint for Global Trade
Maariv pointed out that the Bab al-Mandab Strait is one of the world’s most important maritime passages, with a significant portion of international trade between Europe and Asia passing through it. As a result, any disruption to navigation in the strait would have direct repercussions for global markets and supply chains.
The newspaper warned that attacks on even a limited number of vessels in this vital corridor could prompt shipping companies to alter their routes, increasing transportation costs and affecting international trade flows.
Comparison with the Strait of Hormuz
In the conclusion of its report, the newspaper compared the Bab al-Mandab Strait with the Strait of Hormuz, arguing that the two waterways together constitute essential pillars of global trade and energy transportation.
It further stated that any simultaneous escalation in these two strategic straits could pose major challenges for Israel and Western countries, given the limited geographical alternatives available to ensure the continued flow of trade and energy through the region.
