Silence on Israeli Strikes and a Controversial Statement: What Did al-Shar’ Say About Hezbollah’s Weapons?
Remarks by the ruling authority in Damascus about disarming Hezbollah spark widespread criticism after the absence of a clear stance on Israeli airstrikes on Syrian territory.
NYN | Reports and Analyses
Statements by the head of the ruling authority in Damascus, known as “al-Shar’,” have triggered a wave of controversy and criticism in political and media circles following his position on recent regional developments, particularly amid the continued Israeli strikes on Syrian territory.
These criticisms come at a time when media reports indicate that Israeli forces have reached areas in Mount Hermon overlooking the Syrian capital, Damascus, while Israeli fighter jets carried out a series of airstrikes targeting locations and forces affiliated with the Syrian government in more than one Syrian city.
Absence of a Clear Position on Israeli Strikes
According to observers, Damascus has not issued any clear official statement condemning the attacks or demanding an end to what are described as violations of Syrian sovereignty. This has raised questions about the official stance toward the repeated Israeli military operations inside Syrian territory.
Statement on Hezbollah’s Weapons
In contrast, a statement by al-Shar’ emerged during a conversation with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, in which he expressed support for a position calling for the disarmament of Hezbollah. According to media sources, he affirmed his “support for the Lebanese president in this direction.”
Observers said this stance drew criticism from parties who view Hezbollah’s weapons as a key factor in confronting Israel and preventing attacks on Lebanese territory.
Condemnation of “Violations of Arab Sovereignty”
Al-Shar’ also stated that he condemns what he described as “all forms of aggression targeting Arab sovereignty,” warning that the current escalation in the region poses a serious threat to regional stability.
However, analysts say these remarks have been interpreted in different ways amid rising tensions in the region, particularly with the continued confrontations between Iran and the United States and its allies.
Criticism and Diverging Reactions
The statements have sparked mixed reactions. Critics argue that Damascus’s position lacks clarity regarding Israeli strikes inside Syria, while others believe the Syrian leadership’s remarks come within the framework of complex political positions tied to sensitive regional and international balances.
These developments come as the region witnesses an unprecedented escalation, with the expansion of military confrontations and political tensions among several regional and international actors.
