American Secrecy Raises Doubts: Mysterious Fires Strike Destroyers and Aircraft Carriers, Taking Them Out of Service
Questions are mounting over the true nature of the malfunctions affecting the U.S. fleet, amid conflicting narratives between “technical accidents” and the possibility of undisclosed attacks.
NYN | Reports and Analyses
Doubts are growing regarding the real causes behind the fires and malfunctions affecting several American naval vessels, as Washington continues to maintain official secrecy. This has opened the door to widespread questions about the actual reasons for these incidents and their timing amid escalating military tensions in the region.
The “Higgins” Fire: Limited Details and Broad Ambiguity
Western media reports revealed that a major fire broke out aboard the American guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins, causing what were described as significant damages, including the failure of the propulsion system and a complete power outage, ultimately rendering the vessel inoperable.
Despite the seriousness of the incident, U.S. military authorities have not disclosed the destroyer’s exact location or provided detailed information regarding the extent of the damage, nor have they specified how long repairs may take. This has further fueled suspicions about the true nature of what occurred.
Repeated Incidents Put the Official Narrative Under Scrutiny
The Higgins incident was not the first of its kind. It was preceded by another fire aboard the aircraft carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower last April, which officially resulted in injuries to several sailors.
Fires also reportedly affected the aircraft carrier Gerald Ford as it was departing the Red Sea operational zone, raising additional questions about a possible connection between these incidents and the ongoing military developments in the region.
Between “Technical Failures” and the Possibility of Targeting
Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Defense (Pentagon) continues to describe these incidents as “technical malfunctions” or “limited fires.” However, observers argue that the repeated occurrence of such incidents during a highly sensitive period casts doubt on this explanation.
Unconfirmed analyses suggest the possibility that some of these naval vessels may have been subjected to direct or indirect attacks, particularly amid the broader regional escalation—something Washington has neither clearly confirmed nor denied.
American Secrecy… Strategic Motives?
Analysts believe that withholding details about these incidents may be linked to military and morale-related considerations, as Washington seeks to preserve the image of its naval superiority and avoid any potential impact on troop morale or on the balance of deterrence in the region.
In the absence of precise information, competing narratives continue to circulate between the official explanation attributing the incidents to technical causes and analyses linking them to broader developments on the ground.
